It's a national holiday, plus I'm on "vacation", but the posts keep coming!
More than a few people have written to me trying to reconcile (1) my distaste for the goings-on in Washington; and (2) my support for Obama last year.
This isn't a political blog, nor do I have an interest in agitating for any given political philosophy. We live in a relatively centrist country, and even in last year's extraordinary election, the split between McCain and Obama wasn't 10/90 – – it was much closer to 50/50. So anyone taking one "side" or the other is going to wind up with a lot of people who disagree (unless his readers are all on a web site heavily tilted to the left or the right).
In my opinion, sometimes history is larger than the people living within it. My support for Obama – – and it wasn't jumping-up-and-down support, but this-one-is-better-than-the-other support, was based principally on his intellect and earnestness. But no one – not Obama, not McCain, not Marmaduke the Dog – could step into office in January 2009 and make things right.
If, for instance, we could hold an election for Captain of the Titanic after it struck an iceberg, we may strive to choose the wisest and most capable leader. But the ship's still going to sink. And a lot of people are still going to perish. An especially intelligent and wise leader may get a few more lifeboats available so that a few more people are saved, and perhaps there will be a little less panic. But it's still going to be bad.
So there can be situations where (a) one can opt for a given leader yet (b) still be really unhappy with the situation. I may be very pleased that I voted for Captain Brown instead of Captain Smith, but I'm still distressed that the ship I am on has its bow sticking in the air and hundreds of people are falling into freezing water.
I hope this helps explain things.