A fellow Sloper sent me this article from the Washington Post – – an excerpt……
allowed banks to claim billions of dollars in additional earnings
simply by tweaking their bookkeeping, greatly enhancing the appearance
that the industry is returning to health.
The proposal, which the standards board will consider issuing for
comment later this month, would require banks to report the value of
all loans and other assets based on the prices that buyers are willing
to pay. This process is called marking to market, and the result is
called a fair value. At present, banks are not required to report the
fair value of most loans. They can instead report a value based on the
original purchase price.
I'm sure we all remember when this goody was given away during the market's swoon. Reverting to the old method seems sensible, don't you think? I mean, if you bought $1 million of FAZ last March, and I asked you on a balance sheet to tell me how much that holding contributed to your net worth, don't you think it would be more proper to say its value was $28,000 (which is the truth) and not $1 million (the original purchase price)? Doesn't that seem beyond the most basic definition of "obvious"?