Originally published on TheTechTrader.com.
Slope of Hope Blog Posts
Slope initially began as a blog, so this is where most of the website’s content resides. Here we have tens of thousands of posts dating back over a decade. These are listed in reverse chronological order. Click on any category icon below to see posts tagged with that particular subject, or click on a word in the category cloud on the right side of the screen for more specific choices.
Hedging Update
Hey Fellow Slopers,
In the table below, I've updated the costs (as of Thursday's close) of hedging the Dow-, NASDAQ 100-, and S&P 500-tracking ETFs against greater-than-20% declines over the next several months, using the optimal puts, along with the costs of similarly hedging a handful of their most widely-traded components. In addition, this week I added five precious metals ETFs to the table. First, a reminder about why I've used 20% as a decline threshold, and what I mean by "optimal puts".
As I mentioned last time, the threshold I usually use when I hedge is 20% (i.e., I want protection against any decline worse than that). The idea for a 20% threshold came from a comment fund manager (and Stanford finance Ph.D.) John Hussman made in October 2008:
An intolerable loss, in my view, is one that requires a heroic recovery simply to break even… a short-term loss of 20%, particularly after the market has become severely depressed, should not be at all intolerable to long-term investors because such losses are generally reversed in the first few months of an advance (or even a powerful bear market rally).
"Optimal puts" are the ones that will give you the level of protection you want at the lowest possible cost. With Portfolio Armor (available as a web app, and an iOS app) you just enter the symbol of the stock or ETF you’re looking to hedge, the number of shares you own, and the maximum decline you’re willing to risk, (your threshold). Then the app uses an algorithm developed by a finance Ph.D. candidate to sort through and analyze all of the available puts for your position, scanning for the optimal ones.
What jumped out at me in putting together this table was the cost of hedging GLD against a greater-than-20% decline over the next several months: 0.31%. With the cost of downside protection this low, if you're long GLD, you might want to consider hedging it here, even if you're bullish on it in the mid- to long-term.
Symbol |
Name |
Cost of Protection (as % of Position value) |
Widely-Traded Stocks |
||
INTC |
Intel |
3.06%** |
CSCO |
Cisco Systems |
3.09%** |
MSFT |
Microsoft |
2.%** |
ORCL |
Oracle |
2.07%* |
BAC |
Bank of America |
6.02%*** |
F |
Ford |
4.32%* |
GE |
GE |
2.35%* |
PFE |
Pfizer |
1.51%* |
WFC |
Wells Fargo |
4.71%** |
T |
AT&T |
1.55%** |
AA |
Alcoa |
3.57% ** |
Major Index ETFs |
||
QQQ |
PowerShares QQQ Trust |
1.48%* |
SPY |
SPDR S&P 500 |
1.04%* |
DIA |
SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average |
0.82%* |
Precious Metals ETFs |
||
GLD |
SPDR Gold Trust |
0.31%* |
SLV |
iShares Silver Trust |
4.48%** |
DBP |
PowerShares DB Precious Metals |
1.4%** |
SGOL |
ETFS Physical Swiss Gold Shares |
1.09%* |
SIVR |
ETFS Physical Silver Shares |
3.82%* |
*Based on optimal puts expiring in September, 2011
**Based on optimal puts expiring in October, 2011
***Based on optimal puts expiring in November, 2011
Disclosure: I'm holding some puts on DIA.
KFT … Can I Have Some More Please? (by Leaf_West)
One of the charts that is making a move today is KFT … looking at the longer time frame charts flies in the face of commodity inflation nailing food manufacturers/processors. The only thing I can think of is that people are stocking up with Kraft Dinner because they are either broke or are awaiting the upcoming Armagedon/end of world scenario. Last time I noticed KD was still $1.16 at Wal-Mart. When it goes above $1.25 I will double my initial KFT stock position …
Cheers … Leaf_West………..Visit my blog