Slope of Hope Blog Posts

Slope initially began as a blog, so this is where most of the website’s content resides. Here we have tens of thousands of posts dating back over a decade. These are listed in reverse chronological order. Click on any category icon below to see posts tagged with that particular subject, or click on a word in the category cloud on the right side of the screen for more specific choices.

Trendline Deserts and Precious Metals (by Springheel Jack)

By -

Everything in life tends to ebb and flow, and trendlines on charts are just the same. Sometimes you're spoilt for choice, and at other times there's not really much to see. That's the case on equities this week so far, and all I have that looks interesting really is a triangle on ES that is now breaking down:

On the SPX 15min chart I have a falling wedge that may be forming, but I'm somewhat doubtful about the lower trendline. A reversal there this morning would strengthen that considerably though, and if we see that then we will have a decent pattern:

So far, so boring, on equities at least, and there's little else to see this morning so I'm going to concentrate on USD and precious metals for the rest of this post. On USD I posted the gap up out of the big UUP falling wedge yesterday and I am going to show the smaller triangle there on the 60min chart today. This is a classic technical long setup, though obviously there is a lot of geopolitical noise with this trade:

Precious metals are looking very interesting this morning, with gold on the verge of breaking the May high. Gold futures are in a tight rising channel and will start to look interesting as a short when that rising channel breaks down:

On the bigger picture I have gold in a broadening ascending wedge from the end of 2008. That wedge has a decent support trendline that's currently in the 1375 area. That may not be the main support level however as you can see that the daily 150 SMA has held on the last six retracements including the last one at the beginning of 2011. The support trendline from that Jan 2011 broke in June and is now being retested. It may well hold. If it doesn't hold then main overhead resistance is in the 1630 area:

Silver may be forming an IHS on the 60min SLV chart. This is an interesting development as if it plays out then it might propel SLV over open gap resistance at 38. That would open the way for a larger bounce and is particularly worth mentioning this morning as on the silver futures (SI), this IHS is now fully formed and has broken the neckline. SLV may well therefore gap over this neckline at the open

On the bigger picture on SLV, SLV is trying to recover the broken support trendline from last year. There's big resistance here, but that SLV has managed to trade above this trendline at all in the last few days is encouraging for bulls:

Short term on equities I'm looking for a short term low here. We might have seen that already, but equally we might make a lower low on positive divergence on the 60min chart. Bonds are saying that the low is made or is close, and I'm expecting equities to hold up ok in July. Short term the broken triangle on ES is arguing for a red day today but that might just be an inside day within yesterday's range.

Hedging Update — Stocks

By -

The Chicago Board Options Exchange Market Volatility Index (VIX) ticked up 8.05% Tuesday to close at 19.87. The table below shows the costs, as of Tuesday's close, of hedging 19 of the 20 of the most actively-traded stocks against greater-than-20% declines over the next several months, using the optimal puts for that.

Comparisons

For comparison purposes, I've also added the costs of hedging the SPDR S&P 500 Trust ETF (SPY), the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (DIA) and the Nasdaq 100-tracking ETF PowerShares QQQ Trust ETF (QQQ) against the similar declines. First, a reminder about what optimal puts mean in this context and why I've used 20% as a decline threshold.

Optimal Puts

Optimal puts are the ones that will give you the level of protection you want at the lowest possible cost. As University of Maine finance professor Dr. Robert Strong, CFA has noted, picking the most economical puts can be a complicated task. With Portfolio Armor (available on the web and as an Apple iOS app), you just enter the symbol of the stock or ETF you're looking to hedge, the number of shares you own and the maximum decline you're willing to risk (your threshold). Then the app uses an algorithm developed by a finance academic to sort through and analyze all of the available puts for your position, scanning for the optimal ones (there's an example of this, with screenshots, in this article about hedging against a US default with puts on TLT).

Decline Thresholds

You can enter any percentage you like for a threshold when using Portfolio Armor (the higher the percentage though, the greater the chance you will find optimal puts for your position). The idea for a 20% threshold comes, as I've mentioned before, from a comment fund manager John Hussman made in a market commentary in October 2008:

An intolerable loss, in my view, is one that requires a heroic recovery simply to break even … a short-term loss of 20%, particularly after the market has become severely depressed, should not be at all intolerable to long-term investors because such losses are generally reversed in the first few months of an advance (or even a powerful bear market rally).

Essentially, 20% is a large enough threshold that it reduces the cost of hedging but not so large that it precludes a recovery. When hedging, cost is always a concern, which is where optimal puts come in.

How Costs Are Calculated

To be conservative, Portfolio Armor calculated the costs below based on the ask prices of the optimal put options. In practice, though, an investor may be able to buy some of these put options for less (i.e., at a price between the bid and the ask).

Why There Were No Optimal Puts for RADS

In some cases, the cost of protection may be greater than the loss you are looking to hedge against. That was the case with Radiant Systems Inc. (RADS). As of Tuesday, the cost of protecting against a greater-than-20% decline in that stock over the next several months was itself greater than 20%. Because of that, Portfolio Armor indicated that no optimal contracts were found for it.

Hedging Costs as of Tuesday's close

The data in the table below is as of Tuesday's close. After the three ETFs listed for comparison purposes, the NYSE stocks are listed in order of their share volume in Tuesday's trading, with the most actively traded stock (MI) listed first; the Nasdaq stocks are listed in a similar order, with the most actively traded Nasdaq stock (NWSA) listed first.

Symbol

Name

Cost of Protection (as % of position value)

  Comparison Index ETFs  

SPY

SPDR S&P 500

1.71%*

DIA SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Avg 1.55%*
QQQ PowerShares QQQ Trust 2.49%*
  NYSE Stocks  
BAC Bank of America Corporation 5.78%*
NLY Annaly Capital Management 1.83%*
F Ford 3.58%*
GE General Electric Company 3.43%*
C Citigroup Inc. 3.99%*
PFE Pfizer Inc. 2.95%*
AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 9.64%*
MGM MGM Resorts International 12.2%*
AA Alcoa, Inc. 5.03%*
JPM JP Morgan Chase & Co. 3.15%*
  Nasdaq Stocks  
NWSA News Corporation 6.51%*
CSCO Cisco Systems, Inc. 4.17%*
QQQ PowerShares QQQ 2.49%*
INTC Intel Corporation 2.94%*
SIRI Sirius XM Radio Inc. 11.0%*
MSFT Microsoft Corporation 2.49%*
ORCL Oracle Corp. 3.56%*
RADS Radiant Systems Inc. No Optimal Puts At This Threshold
MU Micron Technologies 12.1%*
AMAT Applied Materials Inc. 4.43%*

*Based on optimal puts expiring in January, 2012.