Slope of Hope Blog Posts

Slope initially began as a blog, so this is where most of the website’s content resides. Here we have tens of thousands of posts dating back over a decade. These are listed in reverse chronological order. Click on any category icon below to see posts tagged with that particular subject, or click on a word in the category cloud on the right side of the screen for more specific choices.

Trading Using Momentum Indicators (by Bkudla)

By -

There are as many methods as there are trader.   I wanted
to share with the Slope a fairly simple method that allows me many high
probability trades. 

First some background.
I trade to pay the bills (all of my business capital/profits
are tied up long term), and I trade using options. To generate cash flow using my speculative account, I am in and out of my trades within 1-3 days.I like to trade big, liquid stocks and indices.I look at about ten big high beta, liquid stocks to trade, so there are almost always a set up every day.  I usually buy 25 to 50 options and
trade only up to 2-3 at any one time; I have tolerance of 15% loss on my
initial position and will reenter if the trade still looks good at a higher or
lower price.  I enter one strike ITM and
front month or one behind that month. 
My two favorite indicators are MACD and %D slow and % D, using a ten minute increments. I set the indicators up as
follows:

MACD 12, 26, signal line 9  |   %D slow 17, 3, 3  |    %D 17, 3

Entry:  For my initial sell/short signal/entry, I look for the crossover of the % D crosses below %D slow and the following two conditions apply:

  •  MACD is in a downtrend
  • %D is above 80

I will add to my position when MACD crosses its signal
line.   

Exit:  I cover (set a trailing sell stop) when MACD crosses back up above its signal line on the five minute.  If the stochastics are still below 20 or
above 80 and have not crossed each other, I may wait for them to cross first. I
will also set a stop at a profit number once past it ($500). For a buy signal
it is %D below 20.

I also use the sell signal method to sell covered calls on
my gold miner positions, as I do not trade them and cover on a cross on the ten
minute. 

Let's take a look at a couple of examples.  

UPS is a stock I write options on a
lot.  It behaves well for trading, so I am comfortable holding long
overnight. I've marked on the graphic where I placed these trades.  On
the third day's signals, had I been in the office, I would have faded the open rather than going long—once the signal hit, it was too late in the trading day.
Snap83

Trading ISRG, on the first trade, I
bought calls. When the Stoch crossed over above 80,  I set a trailing stop.  Positions were closed where highlighted.  It was slightly
profitable. I did not reenter the trade as Stochastics did not fall enough for
me to be comfortable.

On the second trade, I entered puts
and called this one out for the group to short.  It was a very profitable
trade, and I closed it EOD, as I do not trust overnight at the moment.

On the third day, I was unable to
trade due to other business commitments. Nevertheless, I've marked the signals so that you can see where I would have placed my
trades.  You might ask, "Why not fade the early rally?".  Because the cross was not about above 80, it wasn't overbought enough for me.

Snap84

I am sure there are many variations on this theme, but it
works pretty well for me, especially when VIX is rising.  Check it out and see for yourself, but you
must take the trades when they present themselves.

A Modest Proposal: Loan Modifications

By -

I originally wrote this post in December 23, 2008. I didn't think that it was too shabby of an idea, and I offer it up as though it might have some relevance.


I have an idea, likely hairbrained, but that will not stop
me from stating it.

Here are some simple facts to consider:

  • Anyone who bought a home 2005 and later
  • Some of those people who bought a home did so under false
    pretenses–I'd not extend these benefits to them.
  • Many of the
    those people are hard working Americans, who did not lie, who did not
    fully understand the egregiousness of loan resets etc, or simply
    believed that continually increasing home values would mitigate any
    concerns that they had.
  • Home prices are falling and LTV ratios
    are very unfavorable for lenders.
  • Payment/interest resets are
    putting borrowers (the good ones and the bad ones) under stress.
  • The recession will put more mortgage/home owners at risk.

My
proposal is not applicable to scammers or flippers, but rather homeowners. Here's my proposal.

Objective: To find a
manageable way to help both borrowers and lenders to rework loan terms;
keep borrowers in their home to the extent practicable; not deal an
egregious blow to lender balance sheets for principal modifications.

Example:
Borrower (qualified, and no falsification) bought a home for $400K and
the loan value was $400K (LTV=100%). At the time of purchase the home's
fair value was not impaired. Interest rate is 6.%; term is 30 years;
payment is $2,400.

The home can now has a fair value of $320K.
That is an asset impairment of $80K affecting both the borrower and the
bank. The bank and the borrower agree to modify the loan provisions. We
bring in another party. The Fed. (Why not?). The bank records a
temporary loan impairment of $80K. This impairment is guaranteed by the
Fed (or through some other arrangement) so the bank creates a deferred
loss that is carried on the balance sheet and shown as a contra
receivable.

The loan is modified so that the principal is now
$320K, the payment term is 35 (420 months) years and the interest rate
is 3%. The payment is now $1,232 per month, for a reduction of 49%. Each
time the borrower makes a payment, the amount of the temporary
impairment is reduced by 1/420 or $190 ($80K/420). The bank will record a
loss in the amount of $190 for each payment made. (One could fashion
some tax consequence to the borrower in the amount of reduced tax
benefit of interest payments).

Periodically, the amount of the
impairment unamortized balance will be reviewed. To the extent that the
impairment can be recouped (there is a recovery in home prices that
would make the $80K temporary impairment now $60K, the bank will reduce
the impairment prospectively. The decrease in the impairment (net of
expense already recognized) would be added to the principal amount of
the mortgage and the future amortized expense reduced. (Loan receivable
would be increased and the deferred liability would be decreased).  This treatment has the benefit or recognizing that over time an economic recovery could gather some steam.

I'm sure that there are lots of
problems with the above, but I see a few benefits:

  • Induces
    borrowers and lenders to work together;
  • Allows the lender to
    not recognize an immediate loan impairment (as the Fed guarantees the
    temporary impairment); keeps the loan from becoming a non performing
    asset (so the bank stabilizes their asset ratios, but interest expense
    is reduced); reduces foreclosures; supports housing values;
  • Allows the borrower to reduce their liability on the temporary
    impairment so long as they are making payments–so that is an inducement
    for them to make payments;
  • Pings the borrower by reduced tax
    benefits of mortgage interest to the extent that they have received a
    benefit. (Rather than having to pay income taxes on debt forgiveness).
  • Reduces the "freebee" perception by those who did not get
    themselves into the pickle.

The above was meant to be broad brush–the devil is always in the details.

I hope that you are still awake by the end of the post.  It has a soporific effect on folks with normal DNA.

Cognitive Dissonance (by Leisa)

By -

Have you started your blog yet? What are you waiting for? Your world of bright ideas is at your finger tips. Here's a re-tread post from my blog.  This post was my attempt to articulate the trouble I was having with the USD shorts in view of the relative risks I saw elsewhere. 

That internal turmoil also served as my fuel for tackling subprime mortgage problem (which turned out NOT to be just subprime but rather a larger CDS problem) and eventually connecting the dots to the mortgage insurers AND the insurance companies who were large purchasers of these fixed income securities.  All of that lead me to conclude that we were setting up for a systemic risk event, and that no asset class would be safe.

My point is not to crow, but rather to highlight how YOUR blog (remember, it can be private!) will help you concretize and organize your thoughts–you can instantly recall them as follows…

Showing newest posts for query cognitive dissonanceShow older posts

Saturday, November 21, 2009

Cognitive Dissonance

Any of us that have had a psychology class are familiar with cognitive dissonance, though it is unlikely that we think about it in our everyday life. I needed a refresher on this definition, and I give it to you, courtesy of Dictionary.com.

cognitive dissonance

Mental conflict that occurs when beliefs or assumptions are contradicted by new information. The concept was introduced by the psychologist Leon Festinger (1919–89) in the late 1950s. He and later researchers showed that, when confronted with challenging new information, most people seek to preserve their current understanding of the world by rejecting, explaining away, or avoiding the new information or by convincing themselves that no conflict really exists. Cognitive dissonance is nonetheless considered an explanation for attitude change.

I like to pay attention to things that bother me, as my subconscious has a lot on the ball. Readers are familiar with my "What do I have to believe is true?" wonderings out loud when I'm confronted with things that are perplexing to me. My current troubling wonder is the so-called dollar carry trade.

I don't pretend to be knowledgeable about the intricate logistics of carry trades, currency reserves and the like. I know enough to be dangerous….and I know enough to sense danger. I do know this: The USD is still the reserve currency, commodities are still priced in USD, and the boat is listing rather heavily to the side of the boat where the shorts are congregated. And being a contrarian just for the sake of being a contrarian risks one's being label a curmudgeon. Or, perhaps I'm just a coward and unable to take risks commensurate with reward.

But for all of the problems with the US economy and the dollar, we still have a pretty good system. (Or perhaps that is my rationale for dealing with this dissonance!). To me, being short USD (and long commodities) feels like shorting a stock that may have a takeover bid at any moment. Is it (short the dollar) the 'smart' or the 'too-good-to-be-true' trade? Father Time always answers that question for us. And perhaps I need to do a little navel gazing to make sure that I'm not the one in the weeds and everyone else on the path to low risk riches.

(Editor's note: If you don't want to do your own blog, but you do want to write an article from Slope on occasion, please write me!)

Weekly Sector Report | 06/04 (by Leisa)

By -

A tough week in the market for the bulls, but the bears were plenty happy.  (Editor's note: yes, we were.) The total stock market index was down 2.52 %, and all 24 of the major sectors were in the negative.  See the table below.

 (Click to make larger)

For the more detail subsectors, below are the best/worst performing over the last week.

(Click to make larger)  Source:  WSJ

I've prepared a detailed report on the sectors, which you can download here.  Make sure to adjust your pdf file viewer settings to see the charts clearly.

SlopeFest East | September 18, 2010

By -

SlopeFest East

September 18, 2010


Slopefest east

Myrtle Beach South Carolina

 

(Leisa here…..) With
the SlopeFest pioneers of Las Vegas having had a grand ole time, SlopeFest East was
quickly in the making by our Iguanadon–technician, travel logistician and all
round good guy.  I think that I speak for many of us at SlopeFest Las
Vegas, that meeting fellow Slopers was enjoyable beyond our collective
expectations. (Though bears battled by the bull market may have held low
expectations!)  I know that my time with fellow Slopers was one of the
most memorable times of my life–it solidified what I know will be enduring
friendships.  Now turning it over to Iggy….

The East Coast SlopeFest
is on!!  Everyone is invited! No matter what part of the world you inhabit, take this opportunity to meet fellow Slopers in beautiful Myrtle Beach South Carolina. 

Here’s the scoop, I’ve
chosen an oceanfront hotel/resort, 
the Caribbean Resortwhere Mrs. Iggy and I have stayed before.  You may certainly choose another hotel. Dinner will be at a nearby restaurant and brewery:  Liberty Steakhouse.  

This time period is perfect because it is outside of prime season.  Simply put:  Rates are low, weather is tolerable and crowds are GONE!   Plan your visit for as long or as short as you like BUT make sure you are there for the 18th! In addition to the beautiful beaches, Myrtle Beach is a golfer's paradise. Click here for more information on this area. 

Here are the logistics–easy for any technician to handle:

  • →Don't over analyze this….just say "Yes"
  • →Make your own reservations at the resort or another of your choice
  • →Adult guests are welcome for dinner–you'll have a chance to show them that your on-line friends are normal.
  • →Dinner will be $60 per head (dinner, a couple of micro-brews, taxes+tip)–payable in cash at the door or via Paypal (e-mail for instructions).  Any leftover money will be applied to after-party on the beach provisions
  • →RSVP with the head count AND your on-line name to iggyslopefest@gmail.com 

Iggy


Leisa here….Tim has
agreed that whomever’s expectations are NOT met by SlopeFest East, he will
fully refund his subscription fees to his site. 
Now what are you waiting for?