Slope of Hope Blog Posts

Slope initially began as a blog, so this is where most of the website’s content resides. Here we have tens of thousands of posts dating back over a decade. These are listed in reverse chronological order. Click on any category icon below to see posts tagged with that particular subject, or click on a word in the category cloud on the right side of the screen for more specific choices.

The ECAT Revolution

By -

Focardi_Rossi_apparatoBN

Well, to be entirely honest… not yet. It may take several years, probably 10 or 20 at least, before we can say adieu to today’s most used sources of energy, but there is a new kid on the block new in the energy field.

Some of you may have heard, as of lately, about the resurgence of the so called ‘cold-fusion’ and also ‘LENR’ (Low Energy Nuclear Reaction) experiments, in other words all those studies aimed to develop clean and non-radioactive energies that are somehow generated simply by exercising some sort of action on the atomic structure of certain materials (i.e. palladium, deuterium, nickel, etc.). You may remember the famous story of Pons and Fleischmann, many years ago, claiming they had obtained something in that direction, but then their theory crumbled miserably when other scientist tried to reproduce the effect in their labs. (more…)

The Scientific Approach to Trading (by Retracement Levels)

By -

This post has no trading setups in it, just a couple of thoughts on the way we approach the market problem.

There are many methods widely available to the public, from Elliott Waves, to Technical Analyisis, Indicators, etc. to try to figure out what the market will do next.

One thing that seems evident is that the vast majority of people is looking pretty much at the same things, although very few take the time needed to question these things. Do they really work or not? Are they based on scientific logic or delusional fantasies? Etc?

I'd like to make some example of the folks that make long terms predictions, for example stating that Gold and Silver will go up a lot in the next few years, or that the SPX will collapse and go back to 300, or that US bonds are the short trade of the century, etc.

(more…)

Exploiting the System (by Retracement Levels)

By -

At Retracement Levels, we usually look to the numbers to find positive expectation, good probabilities, or simply inefficiency and dysfunctionality in certain trading vehicles, to exploit the market system un-efficiencies in our favor.

Here below we would like to present a very simple strategy that emerged comparing the behavior of certain LONG and SHORT securities based on the same underlying.

This strategy can produce risk-free profits to anyone able to follow it for a period of time long enough to make the strategy profitable (usually a few months).

This strategy works at best during trends and suits particularly well investors and mutual fund managers because it produces gains just by holding the positions (you can literally 'sleep' on the positions until they are profitable).

The strategy can be applied to many securities that we have analyzed, but in this example we will disclose only the QLD+QID Long+Short Strategy. Please be aware this strategy may not work on other type of securities, so the suggestion here is that you apply this strategy only on QLD and QID, unless you are able to verify on what other securities it will work (not difficult to do: you will just need a charting software, some data and Excel).

Here below is the first slide we wanted to show you (click on the images to pop-up a fully expanded view).

Qqq_vs_qid_1

The strategy in the example above consisted of
buying the same amount (i.e. $100) of QLD and QID on July 2006 and then
holding positions until October 2007. Because of the asymmetrical diverging
nature of these 2 specific ETFs (QLD and QID), you would have realized a
22.23% profit on the total capital invested (i.e. $100+$100=$200), or
$44.47, regardless the direction of the market.

This happens because of the method used
to calculate the price of QLD and QID in relationship to their
underlying (the Nasdaq100 index) and also because of the way you invest
on them in a long+short strategy.

The final result of this deviation between the two ETFs is that one of the two  vehicles will always produce a
smaller loss or a bigger gain than the other, when holding the positions for a sufficient amount
of time.

The second image (below) shows us the same strategy on another period, from October 2007 to March 2008 (and onward) and as well here, in only four months, the strategy would have realized a 10.22% net profit on the total capital invested, again regardless the direction of the market (you would have been both long and short).

You can calculate by yourself what the gains would have been in the following period, where it says: 'do it yourself' – it's a good exercise to see by yourself how this strategy works.

Qqq_vs_qid_2

Finally, the chart below shows that by being long and short QLD and QID from the bottom of the crash in November 2008, you would have made a +200% profit on QLD and a -83% loss on QID.

Betting $100 in each direction ($100 long QLD + $100 short QID), you would now have a 317$ account (more or less) or a >58% profit in a year, a net gain realized without taking any risk, without betting on a specific market direction (e.g. without betting on a continuation of the 2008 Bear Market).

Qqq_vs_qid_3

The Long-Short QLD+QID trading strategy presented here is an excerpt from a new subscription package recently created and named "TRADING IDEAS" (you can find more about it here or contact us for info).

You can find more free trading ideas on the Retracement Levels Blog.

If you are interested in a trial of the Retracement Levels services and
tools for professional traders, try out our 7-Days Trials.