Slope of Hope Blog Posts

Slope initially began as a blog, so this is where most of the website’s content resides. Here we have tens of thousands of posts dating back over a decade. These are listed in reverse chronological order. Click on any category icon below to see posts tagged with that particular subject, or click on a word in the category cloud on the right side of the screen for more specific choices.

Uncle Buck and One Lonely Bull (by Gary)

By -

Pssst… come 'ere. Did you hear the one about the guy who's still
bullish the US dollar? Yes, he actually exists. No no, I am not
including the perpetually dollar bullish Prechter and Hochberg. They
are a given.

But aside from them, I heard a rumor that this
other guy actually exists. Fear not however Hope '09 participants; what
are the odds that this lone guy would be right against an entire
financial world on the other side of that trade?

Everybody from
government to monetary officials are stacked against the USD. Wall
Street and the financial establishment remain on the other side of this
lucrative trade as they pitch their wares to the traumatized public.
The gold bugs who think rising copper and oil is good for the gold
sector? They're on board and indeed, leading the charge. So why worry
about a dollar rebound? 

Well, the dollar has done some terrible
technical work on the big picture, which certainly informs NFTRH's view
for 2010, but in the short term all I see is what could be interpreted
as a break from a falling wedge (not shown on this chart that is
already too busy), a 3rd day above the SMA 50 (for the first time on
this systematic and grinding decline), RSI and MACD looking good and a
technical target up there at around the SMA 200.

Usd

If we are to
get a #2 leg in a mini cyclical bull (in hope), the dollar will first
rise and correct this mess, and that one lonely bull would be king of
the world for a short while on a short covering rally in USD. If not,
AGAIG '09 (as good as it gets) will continue to terminus and our
protagonist of one will join the rest of the world in staring down Bob
Prechter.  —Gary

FrankenMarket Lives (by Gary)

By -

Happy Thanksgiving to all who celebrate.  This is Gary with my first published commentary from 2004 reproduced below.  The reason I am posting it (assuming TK doesn't mind publishing a 5+ year old piece) is because everything still looks applicable today — only on STEROIDS. 

The previous guest poster, Mark, noted that well-paying semiconductor (among many others) jobs went away in the US and what I was trying to point out in FrankenMarket is the systematic nature of the US decline.  I clearly remember the day Mr. Magoo, I mean Alan Greenspan, in response to a congressman's inquiry about US manufacturing jobs said "ours is an increasingly information-based economy; if you make things in this country going forward, you may not do so well".  That is what I recall, although a few words may have been different.  I was stunned that he actually admitted it. 

Aside from running biiwii.com and biiwii.blogspot.com, I am also the owner of a small manufacturing company.  Thankfully we are 100% healthcare focused, but I am still very sensitive to the issues that Mark noted and Greenspan put a punctuation upon.  Anyway, with that preamble out of the way…

FrankenMarket Lives

Introduction
 

As we enter the
summer of 2004, our markets appear to be moving with all the grace
of Dr. Frankenstein’s creation, staggering forward, arms
outstretched and seeking sanctuary. 
Ideally, the market would find that comfortable place in the
arms of a healthy, productive and fundamentally sound economy. 
But will it find those loving arms, or will it instead
ultimately find an angry mob, ready to strike it down?

What follows is
a breakdown of the situation as I see it. 
There will be no charts of trends or statistics, but merely
what I consider to be a common sense overview of the situation. 
I will compare what was to what now is, at
least as far as the US economy is concerned.

 


A Country
That Was


The very
origins of America, at least westernized America, are rooted in
independence, self-reliance and hard work. 
A land of opportunity for anyone willing to work hard, take
chances and go for what became known as the “American Dream”. 
In short, people were free to come here and define themselves
and in so doing, define a great nation that seemed to out-work,
out-produce and out-compete most others. 
It is no wonder that as this great vacuum was filled with
productive people seeking a better life, America was built, brick by
brick and with constant sweat-equity, into such a powerful economic
and cultural force, affecting and influencing the majority of the
modern world.

From the early
days of the industrial revolution right on through two world wars
and well into the cold war, America seemed to thrive as each new era
presented its own particular set of problems. 
There were setbacks of course, notably the Great Depression
of the early 1930’s.  In
fact, many would argue that policies originating from the
depression’s aftermath would set the country on a course to a
destination we now find ourselves approaching; a predominantly
paper-based, service oriented economy and a financial system
underpinned by credit (and its evil twin, debt), speculation and
fiat debt paper, AKA the US dollar. 


 


Our Modern
Economy

Whereas a less
mature, formative America worked and produced itself to the stature
of superpower, we now find a bustling, mature society that sadly
feels entitled to its riches and stature. 
In short, hubris has set in to the American consciousness,
and it is hubris that I believe will be its downfall. 
We are simply not seeing things through the same eyes that
our great grandparents, grandparents and even parents saw them
through.  And because of
that fact, we have transitioned from production to consumption. 
Consumption being a much easier route. 
After all, why work and produce for what you want when you
can attain easy credit, and seemingly get the same results. 

This would not be so unsettling if it were only a portion of
our population going in this direction, but the scary part is that
the whole country, Uncle Sam, has gotten on board and
I would argue, has led the charge into this brave new world of Alan
Greenspan’s “information economy”. 


Meanwhile,
third world nations do the work that we have risen above as an
entitled superpower.  Why
would we need to do the “dirty” jobs like manufacturing after
all, when we are the world’s number one financial services
provider?  We will
continue to do certain dirty work, such as construction, that
can’t be outsourced.  And
if it’s construction for infrastructure, so much the better. 
Uncle Sam is hiring! 

With
your depreciating dollars.

This leads me
to the main point regarding our current economic recovery. 
This is a recovery built on inflation, not real productivity. 
This far into a recovery cycle, I would expect to have seen a
far less accommodative Fed, as growth has really picked up and
inflationary pressures are becoming apparent even to those who
believe the official massaged numbers in the CPI and PPI.  But
as a friend of mine says, we’ll probably get “tightening lite”, or the
Fed talking the talk, but in fear of short circuiting the economy it
created through unprecedented liquidity from negative real interest
rates, a credit system gone berserk, and vendor financing agreements of
massive proportions in the form of Asian central bank purchases of our
treasury paper. 



 


Frankenmarket


So where does
this leave our poor monster, sloppily stitched together and
meandering aimlessly forward?  The
market will look to the economy, and being a forward looking
monster, I expect it to see one of two things; The Fed taking away
the punch bowl for real, deciding too late that the party is over,
or more realistically, it will see a Fed doing all it can to sustain
the monster it created.  This
market was stitched together with debt, and it will require more of
the same to keep it going.  We
are knocking on the door of hyperinflation, and I believe the Fed
will choose to open that door, given that it is too late for our
economy to de-leverage in any orderly fashion. 

As entitled
modern Americans, I can envision the majority seeing this as
bullish, and Alan Greenspan gaining even more accolades as the
celebrated maestro.  Frankenmarket
will probably get an extra bounce in its step. 
A warning before you go full-bore bullish longer term though;
for a reality check on what hyperinflation means, do a little
research on what Germany experienced in the 1920’s. 
By contrast, a garden variety Japan style deflation would
have seemed very tame.  But
it is too late for that now.

The Year the Game Changed

By -

Gary from Biiwii with another macro chart worth noting.

In 1999, the price of gold bottomed after having ridden the
post-Volcker era down along with treasury yields. This was due to the
sound policies the former Fed chief rammed home and the confidence that
ensued.

Tyx

Enter the Maestro, Greenspan, who inherited the benefits
of this sound policy and used it for years as a lever to bail out the
system whenever needed. Many people thought Greenspan was a great and
powerful Fed chief, but in actuality he was simply playing off the
confidence that had been restored in the monetary and financial systems.

I
think this macro chart has profound implications and clearly shows that
sometime in the 1999-2001 period, we went off the charts as increasing
debt burden became not only acceptable, but necessary to support the
lifestyles we had grown accustomed to. Denninger's letter in the previous post illustrates China's role in the macro Ponzi scheme in the harshest of terms.

There
is talk of a gold bubble and in my opinion, the most unsavory of the
gold bug 'community' are out in full force, hoping for nothing less.
But gold is not in a bubble. That is because gold represents an anchor
to sensible systems and simpler times. It is going nowhere. The other
stuff, the remnants of a rotting system is what is going somewhere and
that somewhere is down. In short, confidence is being lost. It is no
coincidence that gold is the only asset in new high (blue sky)
territory.

Back to the chart, look at what happened as Greenspan
finally ran out of Volcker's ammo and the market realized that this was
simply a shell game promoted mainly by the macro vendor financing
relationship between the US and China. There have been various means of
keeping treasuries aloft, not least of which is the need for China and
other creditors to keep buying them or at the least, not talk them
down. Gold's honest monetary value has simply picked up on the rigged
game beneath the surface and sought the value that treasury yields have
thus far refused to seek.

At the very least, this is a picture
of honesty beneath the surface and sadly it is a picture that most
people will either never see or come to see when the media are shoving
it down their throats and they panic into gold at god knows what higher
price than it is currently at.

I'll kill it here, but when I see and ponder pictures like this, I hear thousands of words.

A Value Proposition

By -

Hi Slope, Gary from Biiwii.com and Biiwii.blogspot.com here again, with something I wrote in 2007 that I think can help settle some of the noise regarding gold, should Tim choose to publish.  I think it is relevant here since Tim often refers to some err, dynamic tension between himself and gold bugs.  🙂

As the rot in Wall Street's dark
alleys works its way from the inside out, from the seediest hedge
funds' leveraged 'investment' vehicles to Main Street's financial
institutions (pensions, 401K's, savings, etc.) gold has taken center
stage, closing above $800 for the first time in its still young bull
market. Fear and anxiety are increasing as the US Dollar falls
further below serious long term support and in this environment,
gold is an emotional conduit through which growing fears of fiat
monetary instability pass. Picture a burning building with a limited
number of exits and a large crowd trying to pile through the door.
Let's call it a… oh I don't know… let's call it a casino.

Gold is the object of many strange and varied perceptions, perhaps
because it is an ancient asset that has always stirred basic human
instincts for wealth, good fortune and even survival. But in light
of the perverted and multi-headed monster we call a financial system
– with seemingly infinite instruments of 'profit' limited only by
the imagination of financial engineers – perceptions toward gold
have become distorted, helped by an enabling Wall Street and
mainstream financial media.

The main point to remember is that gold does nothing; it just sits
there and does not care about the crazy gyrations going on all
around it. But to understand and accept this, casino patrons must
first accept that the metrics they have been schooled in and the
rules they have been taught over the fiat decades to play by are not
applicable. Filling the void that this lack of understanding creates
is a whole host of opinions, many disparaging and/or dismissive.
Others simply attempt to fit this "asset class" into
conventional metrics. The inspiration for this missive was a recent
SeekingAlpha
piece by Brad Zigler called
All
That Glitters May Not Be So Golden
. Mr. Zigler did not write a
'hatchet piece' on gold but what I find interesting is his and many
other financial media correspondents' analysis of gold as a return
(or lack thereof) instrument.

Gold pays no risk premium as it carries no default risk. But in the
world of financial media-fed perceptions that is a bad thing. No
return you say? No markup? No leverage? Who needs that?! Gold is
about value and nothing more in my opinion. That is why I refuse to
get excited when its fiat currency denominated price goes up and why
I also remain at a normal pulse rate when said 'price' declines
sharply. I do agree that when trading or investing in the gold
miners (as I do) it is important to keep traditional metrics in
mind. But the miners are my casino of choice and I most certainly do
not see the gold miners as gold, a gold equivalent or anything other
than a potentially hugely leveraged play on an enduring asset of
value.

Back in the real world, players are just beginning to get the hint
that the risk they have taken on in the hunt for return in some very
dark corners has come at a price and the price is a massive debit
against the entire system of something for leveraged nothing. Yes,
gold pays no premium but neither is it subject to this debit because
it never went anywhere to begin with.
It
Is What It Is
(this is the credo by which the website was
created) and as a barometer of global financial sentiment its
exchange value is rising versus a whole host of paper promises not
to mention many hard assets. So what many investors now need is a
sort of 12 step program as they attempt to 'put down the crack pipe'
and come to an understanding that real value has nothing to do with
return (unlike modern portfolio and asset allocation theory) and it
certainly has nothing to do with leverage.

Mr. Zigler's
assertions
and my responses:


Debate
has raged for some time now about the utility of gold in a
portfolio. Forget, for a moment, the breathless claims of
infomercial touts and
Parade
magazine advertisers. Think, instead, of asset class selection.

Why
should anyone add gold—or, for that matter, any asset—to a
portfolio? The answer that comes immediately to many people's minds
is "return." It's the promise of outsized, and often
outlandish,
returns that entices people to call that 800 number in the wee hours
of the morning to get their hands on the yellow metal.

There should be no debate. An asset of
historic value belongs in a portfolio if debt obligations (bonds)
and calls on corporate earnings (stocks) belong there. I agree, the
800 number pitch men are seedy characters capitalizing on fear and
insecurity, but why are they part of the conversation? Have you ever
seen the movie
Boiler
Room
? The world of stock scams dwarfs that of unscrupulous
precious metals dealers.


Gold
isn't the end-all, be-all, however. In the long term, the metal's
price is notoriously unstable. Since gold's price was allowed to
float in 1970, its annualized standard deviation—its price
variance—has been clocked at nearly 20 percent, versus 15 percent
for blue-chip stocks. And in that time, gold's return has only
averaged 8 percent. The S&P 500 earned 11 percent per year.

There is the word "return" again. The reason gold has
under-performed over the measured time frame (minuscule in the
context of history) is because contrary to what some gold bugs may
think, there certainly was upside to the fiat money system. This
upside was manifested in liquidity to build out all manner of
productive enterprise. The United States for example spent the
majority of the 20th century on the upside of this build-out. The
question now becomes 'do we remain on the upside or have the secular
changes beginning in and around 2000 marked a decided switch to the
inevitable payment to the piper (of the debt used to keep the dream
alive)?' If you think there is still productive upside, you will see
gold's 'return' as sub-par. If you believe that secular changes are
at hand, you are looking for that exit door in a crowded casino and
you don't give a damn about return. You want to stay whole.


So what
return can we
expect
from gold? Well, financial theory says you can't expect any increase
in an asset's value without growth prospects. Stocks' expected
return derives from earnings growth. Issuers of corporate securities
can create things and grow. There's a real prospect for a company
trading its shares or warrants to be worth more and more as the
result of management decisions. Gold itself doesn't produce
earnings, and for that reason its expected return can be
approximated as zilch. Nada. Bupkis.

Mr. Zigler is correct. Gold provides no 'return' in the modern asset
allocation theory sense of the word. But in bringing the word
'value' into the equation he again shows how modern portfolio
theorists are trained; no return, no 'growth' = no value
proposition. Gold does not stand at $806 this morning because of its
growth but rather because of its retained value vs. paper
instruments – USD first and foremost – which are coming under heavy
questioning. It should be noted that in the US the stocks of these
growth entities are denominated in USD.


Appreciation
in the price of gold, of course, does occur. History attests to
that. There's just no reason to
expect
it. What influences the price of gold are external, not intrinsic,
forces.

It appears Mr. Zigler and I have been watching two different
financial systems over the last several years but I certainly agree
that gold's value is affected by external forces.

He then goes on to write about the gold miners which is my usual
subject matter on the
TA
Blog
, so I will just end here this critique of modern portfolio
theory as it applies to gold. I hope it helps shed a little light on
an alternate way of thinking for a few people.

I will leave you with a final thought that I was taught early on in
a school of decidedly unconventional asset theory. Price is price
and value is value. They are not one in the same. Unfortunately that
simple thought has been schooled out of the masses. I have no doubt
that pitchmen of all types will come out of the woodwork to hawk the
golden solution to an awakening public. A fortunate few will keep it
simple however and remember that real value is enduring and real
value is not a pitch. I find value splitting wood at my wood pile. I
find value in jamming loudly on guitar. I find value in Google. I
find value in the air I breathe. I find value in remaining
financially whole. I do not find value in debits attached to an
unpayable black hole.