The final, six-month performance of our top ten names from August 6th, with three precious metals ETFs circled (Screen capture via Portfolio Armor).
Moving On From Precious Metals
In a post last week (Silver Isn’t The Next GameStop), we wrote that we were still bullish on the silver ETF SLV. We’re not bullish on it anymore. We’re no longer bullish on precious metals in general. Maybe you shouldn’t be either. Here we explain why. First, let’s consider why you might be bullish on them in the first place.
Do You Want To Make Money Or Be Right?
Bloomberg’s Joe Wiesenthal touched a nerve with this tweet last week, showing that gold prices had dropped since the Georgia Senate runoffs.
The reason that tweet touched a nerve is because many investors own precious metals for ideological reasons. They’re into Austrian economics, they believe profligate government spending will lead to hyperinflation, etc. Maybe they’ll even be right someday. But why not make some money in the meantime?
What Makes A Good Forecaster
When’s the last time you updated your beliefs on precious metals?
Our system doesn’t have beliefs, but it does update its analysis every trading day.
Updating Our Take On Precious Metals
Every trading day, our system updates its ranking of every underlying security with options traded on it in the U.S., based on its analysis of total returns and options market sentiment. We broke this down for the iShares Sliver Trust ETF (SLV) in December (Why-Yo Silver), focusing on the options sentiment part:
Here’s a screen capture from our admin panel as of July 23rd, summarizing key steps in the analysis that selected our top ten names. Below we’ll explain the 8th row containing SLV while referring to the columns labeled with red letters.
Columns B-through-F relate to various gauges of options market sentiment we use – you can read the post linked above for more detail on those. But for before we apply any of them, we need to have a positive number in column A.
Screening For Total Returns
We need the mean of the most recent 6-month return for a security and its average 6-month return over the long term (long term = 10 years, if available) to be positive. The higher a securities average 6-month return has been over the long term, the more forgiving this screen is over the short term, and vice-versa.
In the case of SLV, the average 6-month return over the last 10 years has been negative, so the screen’s not very forgiving.
This and subsequent screen captures are via Portfolio Armor.
The other precious metals ETFs that appeared among our top ten names six months ago, the VanEck Vectors Gold Miners (GDX) and the ProShares Ultra Gold (UGL) fail this screen too now.
Cutting Losers Loose
This screen doesn’t weed out all losers, of course. After all, it didn’t weed out the losers among our August 6th top names.
Our ten top names from August 6th.
But it does keep you from picking names in a downtrend. And, in doing that, it frees up space to find new winners, as our system did with Nano Dimension (NNDM) a couple of months ago.
And with MicroStrategy (MSTR) a week later.
What If You’re Right About Precious Metals?
What if you’re right that there’s going to be a short squeeze or something else driving up silver prices, or that we’ll suddenly get a bout of inflation driving up gold prices? Then you’ll be in earlier on the next upswing than us. But in the meantime, we’ll be screening for names already on the upswing with potential for more gains.