The Art of Survival and Growth

By -

Position-Sizing Strategies for Options Traders

Trading is an unforgiving game. Many enter, few last. The difference between those who thrive and those who falter is often a function of risk—specifically, how much capital they allocate to any given trade. Enter position sizing, an indispensable weapon in any trader’s arsenal, shaping both longevity and profitability.

Successful traders don’t think in terms of individual wins and losses, but rather in the law of large numbers. The goal isn’t to avoid losses, but to ensure they never deliver a knockout blow. Whether you trade credit spreads, iron condors, or directional plays, understanding how to size positions appropriately is critical.

Conservative Position-Sizing Techniques

  1. Fixed Percentage Allocation The foundation of prudent trading is position-sizing relative to total capital. Allocating a fixed percentage—typically between 1% and 5%—ensures that a single misstep doesn’t wipe out months of gains.
    • Example: A trader with a $100,000 portfolio allocating 2% per trade risks $2,000. A 50% loss on a trade equates to only $1,000, preserving capital for future opportunities.
    • Pros: Protects against drawdowns, ensures longevity.
    • Cons: Limits the upside in high-confidence setups.
  2. Volatility-Based Positioning Options traders live and die by volatility. During high-IV environments, traders reduce position sizes to mitigate large swings; in lower-IV environments, they increase sizing to maximize returns.
    • Example: When the VIX spikes above 30, a trader might allocate only 1% per trade. When the VIX drops below 15, they may increase sizing to 3% per trade.
    • Pros: Adapts to changing market conditions.
    • Cons: Requires ongoing adjustment and discipline.

Aggressive Position-Sizing Techniques

  1. Kelly Criterion (High-Risk, High-Reward) The Kelly Criterion is beloved by gamblers and professional traders alike. It aims to maximize long-term growth by sizing positions relative to probability and expected return. However, Kelly often recommends aggressively large bet sizes—sometimes 20% or more of total capital—which can lead to ruin during losing streaks.
    • Example: If a trader has a historical win rate of 80% with a 1:1 risk-reward, full Kelly might suggest risking 20% of capital. Using half-Kelly, the risk would be 10%.
    • Pros: Mathematically optimal for maximizing long-term growth.
    • Cons: Extremely aggressive, can lead to substantial drawdowns in bad streaks.
  2. Martingale Position-Sizing

The Martingale strategy rests on the principle of doubling down after a loss. While theoretically effective in markets with infinite capital, real-world constraints render it unsustainable for most traders.

  • Classic Martingale: Double position size after each loss.
    • Example: A trader starts with a $1,000 position. A loss leads to a $2,000 position on the next trade, then $4,000, and so on.
    • Pros: Guarantees recovery—if capital is unlimited.
    • Cons: Can lead to total portfolio wipeout during prolonged losing streaks.
  • Modified Martingale: Increase size incrementally rather than doubling.
    • Example: Instead of doubling, a trader might increase position size by 50% after each loss ($1,000 → $1,500 → $2,250, etc.).
    • Pros: Less capital-intensive than classic Martingale.
    • Cons: Still highly risky during extended losing streaks.

Anti-Martingale Position-Sizing

  1. Pyramiding Winners The anti-Martingale approach flips the script by increasing size after a win rather than a loss. This method allows traders to capitalize on strong momentum instead of chasing losses.
    • Example: A trader starts with $1,000. If they win, they increase the next trade size to $1,500, then $2,250, and so forth.
    • Pros: Compounds capital in favorable conditions.
    • Cons: Can lead to overexposure in extended winning streaks.
  2. Fixed Ratio Positioning This method, pioneered by Ryan Jones, ties position sizing to predefined profit increments. As capital grows, trade size increases in a measured manner.
    • Example: A trader increases position size by 1 contract for every $5,000 gained. A 5-contract position at $25,000 scales to 6 contracts at $30,000, 7 at $35,000, etc.
    • Pros: Scales gradually, allowing for controlled growth.
    • Cons: Slower compounding than aggressive approaches.

Applying Position-Sizing to Your Portfolio

Survival is the first rule of trading. Without proper position sizing, even the best strategy is doomed. Conservative approaches like fixed-percentage and volatility-based sizing keep you in the game. Aggressive strategies like Kelly and anti-Martingale techniques can generate outsized returns but require a stomach for risk. And Martingale? Well, that belongs in a Las Vegas casino, not your trading portfolio.

The market rewards the disciplined. Manage risk wisely, and you’ll always have capital to seize the next great opportunity.

I’ve been trading options professionally for 20+ years, and if there’s one thing experience has taught me, it’s this: success isn’t about chasing moonshots—it’s about discipline, probabilities, and consistency.

As a long-time Sloper, I know how rare it is to find an options newsletter that’s free from hype and marketing gimmicks. That’s why I created The Option Premium, the antidote to flashy marketing—a no-BS, high-quality options newsletter focused on education, research, actionable trades, weekly indicators and building options-based portfolios that actually matter.

No annoying upsells. No spam. No “limited-time offers.” Just one free email per week to help you trade with greater precision, patience, and probability.

📩 Join The Option Premium for free and see for yourself: The Option Premium

Probabilities over predictions,

— Andy Crowder