Stacking the Odds

By -

I’ll preface this by saying that, philosophically, I’m a fan of precious metals. I’d love to see them thrive and prosper. They are, as many have pointed out, the only real insurance against the insanity of central bankers.

However, metals have been in a bear market since September of 2011 (and how many assets can you say that about? Not many). I have made some posts lately suggesting that maybe – just maybe – they are starting to find firm ground. This morning, yet again, the floor has been knocked out from beneath gold, and it’s plunging to levels last seen in the depths of the financial crisis. This would be the equivalent of seeing a quote of 700 on the S&P 500. It’s a big deal.

In spite of this, our kook friends are relying on that old psychological standby: that those “stacking” actual metal have nothing to worry about, because the “paper” market doesn’t reflect reality. That, indeed, the market is being manipulated by malicious sellers (just to pull a page from the Chinese script). To wit, here are some comments from this morning’s ZH post about gold’s tumble:

1127-stackers

I’ve pointed this out before, but the fact that one’s “stack” hasn’t changed physical size due to market forces (which would actually be kind of cool, let’s face it) doesn’t mean its value has not, in fact, diminished. That would be the equivalent of some poor soul waving his Zynga share certificate that he bought a few years ago around and saying that since it still 8 1/2 by 11 inches, it hadn’t really changed. It has.

The market reflects reality, and this “stackers versus paper” dichotomy isn’t just wrong, but is actually kind of pathetic. (As a side note, I’d also remark that I’m not surprised that a fellow stating that market price of gold is “fake” and that he’s eager to purchase more of this collapsing asset misspelled the word “buy”, which most first grade children have a fairly firm grasp on, spelling-wise).