Slope of Hope Blog Posts

This is the heart and soul of the web site. Here we have literally tens of thousands of posts dating back over a decade. These are listed in reverse chronological order. You can also click on any category icon to see posts tagged with that particular category.

For Clarity’s Sake

By -

As we amble our way toward Christmas (and, yes, it is "Christmas" – – – not "Holiday") things are getting progressively more quiet here on the blog; I don't expect traffic to pick back up until January 2nd. But I'll say this……….

Yes, I'm enthused about a large number of bullish patterns (for me, anyway), and I'm talking about plenty more long setups than I usually do. But, just to be clear, my multi-year view is still aiming for the target you see below:


My belief in certain techniques (and gurus) has definitely been shaken this year, but my long-term viewpoint has not. So, in case it isn't abundantly clear, I just wanted to say so.

Continued good luck with your wrapping and dinner preparation duties. We're hosting Christmas this year, so it's going to be a big one. Oh, and thanks for the beautiful Christmas ornaments, which I just received today.

URE Merits Another Mention

By -

I'm starting to wonder if I should more aggressively pursue the domain since I keep focusing on bullish ideas instead of bearish ones. Anyway, I bought a largish block of URE earlier today. My chart-brain (bullish on this) conflicts with my state-of-the-world brain (real estate?!?!!?!?!?), but this is one of the finest charts I've seen in a while. A break above $6.99 would totally seal the deal.


Quote of the Month

By -

After seeing it mentioned many times in the comments section, I finally bought and started reading Fooled by Randomness, which I am enjoying tremendously. I just finished Section 1 of the book.

As I was reading it last night, a quote on page 126 just about knocked me off my feet (and would have, were it not for the fact I was reading it in bed). It is as follows:

A theory that does not present a set of conditions under which it would be considered wrong would be termed charlatanism – it would be impossible to reject otherwise. Why? Because the astrologist can always find a reason to fit the past event, by saying that Mars was probably in line but not too much so (likewise to me a trader who does not have a point that would make him change his mind is not a trader).

Can you imagine what two words instantly sprang to my mind? They rhyme with "Melliott Crave." Not to say that I've reached any kind of final conclusion personally, but I've got to say again, those words really resonated in a way that I bet a lot of readers here can understand.